Does the value of quality of life depend on duration?

Nancy Devlin, Aki Tsuchiya, Ken Buckingham and Carl Tilling
Additional contact information
Aki Tsuchiya: Economics Department, University of Sheffield
Ken Buckingham: Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Otago
Carl Tilling: School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield

No 09/07, City University Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, City University, London

Abstract: The aims of this study are to investigate the feasibility of eliciting Time Trade Off (TTO) valuations using short durations; to determine the effect of contrasting durations on individuals’ responses to the TTO; to examine variations within and between respondents’ values with respect to duration; and to consider the insights provided by participants’ comments and explanations regarding their reaction to duration in the valuation task. 27 participants provided TTO values using short and long durations for three EQ-5D states. Feedback was sought using a series of open ended questions. Of the 81 opportunities to observe it, strict constant proportionality was satisfied twice. 11 participants had no systematic relationship between duration and value; 11 provided consistently lower valuations in long durations, while 5 had higher valuations in long durations. Comments provided by participants were consistent with the values they provided. Mean TTO values did not differ markedly between alternative durations. We conclude that it is feasible to elicit TTO values for short durations. There is considerable heterogeneity in individuals’ responses to the time frames used to elicit values. Further research is required to ensure that the values used in cost effectiveness analysis adequately represent preferences about quality and length of life.Keywords: EQ-5D; PROMs, health outcomes; performance indicators

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hap and nep-hea
Date: 2009-05
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.city.ac.uk/economics/dps/discussion_papers/0907.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cty:dpaper:0907

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in City University Economics Discussion Papers from Department of Economics, City University, London
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Michael Ben-Gad ().