Voting with the Crowd: Do Single Issues Drive Partisanship?

Martin B. Schmidt ()

No 57, Working Papers from Department of Economics, College of William and Mary

Abstract: We examine whether survey data supports the anecdotal evidence which suggests that group association impacts the individual’s stated beliefs. Specifically, we examine whether a rise in the relative importance of a single issue, i.e., national security, blurs the traditional importance of socio-economic variables in determining an electorate’s political party association. Further we examine whether such blurring occurs across the responses to questions outside the scope of this single issue. We find that in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001, the relative importance of national security rose in United States’ electorate and reduced the relative importance of socio-economic variables in determining the electorate’s political association and for both security and non-security issues.

Keywords: Elections; Voting Preferences; Group Preferences; Conformity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E41 E52 C32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-pol
Date: Written
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://web.wm.edu/economics/wp/cwm_wp57.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cwm:wpaper:57

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, College of William and Mary
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Beth A Freeborn ().