Two Views on Institutional Development: The Grand Transition vs the Primacy of Institutions
Martin Paldam and
Erich Gundlach ()
DEGIT Conference Papers from DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade
The Grand Transition (GT) view claims that economic development is causal to institutional development, and that many institutional changes can be understood as transitions occurring at roughly the same level (zones) of development. The Primacy of Institutions (PoI) view claims that economic development is a consequence of an exogenous selection of institutions. Our survey of the empirical evidence and our own estimates reveal that it is easy to find convincing evidence supporting either of the two views. Property rights do affect development as suggested by the PoI. However, democracy is mainly an effect of development as suggested by the GT. We conclude that the empirical results are far too mixed to allow for a robust assessment that one of the two views is true and the other false. This finding implies that focusing on institutional development is unlikely to be successful as the key strategy for the economic development of poor countries.
Keywords: Grand transition; primacy of institutions; democracy; corruption; development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-pol, nep-soc and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:deg:conpap:c012_004
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DEGIT Conference Papers from DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Jan Pedersen ().