Heterogeneity in reported well-being: evidence from twelve european countries

Andrew Clark (), Fabrice Etilé (), Fabien Postel-Vinay (), Claudia Senik () and Karine Van der Straeten ()

DELTA Working Papers from DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure)

Abstract: This paper models the relationship between income and self-reported well-being using random-effect techniques applied to panel data from twelve European countries. We cannot distinguish empirically between heterogeneities in the utility function (translating income into utility) and the expression function (turning utility into self-reported well-being), but we strongly reject the hypothesis that individuals carry out these joint transformations in the same way. The "marginal well-being effect of income" is very different in the four classes we identify; we thus expect preferences for redistribution and behaviour to be different across these classes. Our results suggests that aggregating data across diverse populations, and countries, may be a dangerous practice.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-eec
Date: 2004
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.delta.ens.fr/abstracts/wp200401.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Heterogeneity in reported well-being:Evidence from twelve European countries (2004)
Working Paper: Heterogeneity in Reported Well-Being: Evidence from Twelve European Countries (2004)
Journal Article: Heterogeneity in Reported Well-Being: Evidence from Twelve European Countries (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:del:abcdef:2004-01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in DELTA Working Papers from DELTA (Ecole normale supérieure)
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().