Extending the Duty of Care: Resource Management and Liability

Phil Hone and Iain Fraser ()

No 2004_06, Economics Series from Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance

Abstract: In this paper we examine the Duty of Care concept as it may be applied to land management in Australia. We show that the efficiency case for extending the Duty of Care owed by farmers to correct off-farm environmental costs is weak. The economic issues of what conservation should be carried out and who should carry out the conservation need not be linked to the subjective question of who should pay. Where transaction costs are high, significant costs may be created by following notions of Polluter Pays rather than following the principle of equating marginal costs of conservation across all sources with the marginal benefits of conservation. Where transaction costs are low, the socially optimal level of conservation can be achieved when one party is made liable regardless of whether they are the cause of the damage or not.

Date: 2004-10-26
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.deakin.edu.au/buslaw/aef/workingpapers/papers/swp2004_06.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dkn:econwp:eco_2004_06

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Series from Deakin University, Faculty of Business and Law, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance
Address: 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood 3125
Series data maintained by Dr Xueli Tang ().