Optimal Policy and (the Lack of) Time Inconsistency: Insights from Simple Models
Marina Azzimonti (),
Daniel Sarte () and
Jorge Soares ()
Additional contact information Daniel Sarte: Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond
Jorge Soares: Department of Economics,University of Delaware
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Pierre Daniel Sarte () and
Jorge Soares ()
Abstract:
In the standard neoclassical model with a representative agent, a benevolent planner who can commit to future policies will, if feasible, levy a single confiscatory tax on capital in the initial period and commit never to set positive taxes thereafter. We show that this policy, which allows for the disposal of distortional taxes entirely, can arise even when sequential governments are unable to credibly promise future tax rates, regardless of how public expenditures are determined.