Is bank capital procyclical? A cross-country analysis

Jacob Bikker () and Paul Metzemakers ()

DNB Working Papers from Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department

Abstract: This paper investigates the determinants of commercial banks' own internal capital targets and potential sensitivity of these levels to the business cycle . World-wide results make clear that banks' own risk is only slightly dependent on the business cycle. Banks tend to hold substantial capital buffers on top of minimum requirements, reflecting that they hold capital for other reasons than strictly meeting the capital requirements. These results suggest that actual capital levels may not become substantially more procyclical under the new risk-sensitive Basel II regime. However, a number of banks, especially smaller ones, combine a relatively risky portfolio with limited buffer capital. A more risk-sensitive capital regulation regime could force these banks to obtain higher capital levels, which would make them more procyclical.

JEL-codes: E32 G21 G28 G31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac, nep-reg and nep-rmg
Date: 2004-09
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.dnb.nl/en/binaries/Working%20Paper%20No%209-2004_tcm47-146666.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dnb:dnbwpp:009

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in DNB Working Papers from Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Arjen Siegmann ().