Domestic Competition and Foreign Direct Investment in Unionized Oligopoly

Junichiro Ishida and Noriaki Matsushima

ISER Discussion Paper from Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University

Abstract: It is often argued, though mostly informally, that outward foreign direct investment (FDI) is a synonym for the export of employment and thus detrimental to the home economy. To see whether and under what conditions this intuition indeed holds true, we construct a model of unionized duopoly and examine welfare implications of outward FDI by paying special attention to the role of domestic competition. We find that the welfare effect of FDI is largely non-monotonic, and there are indeed such things as gexcessive FDI.h We also show that, when FDI reduces welfare, this negative effect arises more at the expense of consumers rather than the unions: in fact, quite contrary to the popular belief, FDI may actually benefit the unions because it serves to soften price competition between them. The paper points out that welfare effects of outward FDI hinges crucially on the nature of domestic competition, and policymakers must carefully take this aspect into consideration.

Date: 2008-03, Revised 2009-10
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.iser.osaka-u.ac.jp/library/dp/2009/DP0757.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dpr:wpaper:0757

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ISER Discussion Paper from Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Fumiko Matsumoto ().