New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers
John F. Cogan (),
Tobias Cwik (),
John B. Taylor () and
Volker Wieland ()
Additional contact information John F. Cogan: Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, HHMB Rm 347, Stanford, CA 94305, USA., http://www.hoover.org/ Tobias Cwik: Goethe University Frankfurt, Grüneburgplatz 1, Uni-Pf. 77, D-60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany., http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/ John B. Taylor: Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA., http://www.stanford.edu/ Volker Wieland: University of Frankfurt, P.O. Box 94, Mertonstrasse 17, D-60054 Frankfurt am Main, Germany., http://www.wiwi.uni-frankfurt.de/
Abstract:
Renewed interest in fiscal policy has increased the use of quantitative models to evaluate policy. Because of modelling uncertainty, it is essential that policy evaluations be robust to alternative assumptions. We find that models currently being used in practice to evaluate fiscal policy stimulus proposals are not robust. Government spending multipliers in an alternative empirically-estimated and widely-cited new Keynesian model are much smaller than in these old Keynesian models; the estimated stimulus is extremely small with GDP and employment effects only one-sixth as large. JEL Classification: C52, E62.
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Press and Information Division, European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
More papers in Working Paper Series from European Central Bank Address: Postfach 16 03 19, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Official Publications ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .