Abstract:
Investment banks legally pursue supposedly price stabilising activities in the aftermarket of IPOs. We model the offering procedure as a signalling game and analyse how the possibility of potentially profitable trading in the aftermarket influences the investment bank's pricing decision. Banks maximise the sum of both the gross spread of the offer revenue and profits from aftermarket trading. They therefore have an incentive to distort the offer price by strategically using aftermarket short covering and exercise of the overallotment option. This results either in informational inefficiencies or exacerbated underpricing, and redistribution of wealth mainly in favour of investment banks.
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-fmk Date: 2002-08-29
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More papers in Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 from Royal Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .