An Experimental Study of Information in Bargaining

Muriel Niederle (), Guillaume Frechette and Uri Gneezy

No 655, Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings from Econometric Society

Abstract: Scores of experimental studies in two player bargaining games have shown the importance of fair outcomes in complete information environments. However, the case of complete information may be a special case, both in terms of the amount of information the players have, and the fact that they can compare relative profits from trade. Our new design allows us to manipulate the information a bargainer has about the value of a trade for the other party. The results of the experiments permit us to identify the value of information for each party, and its role in determining efficiency and the distribution of profits. We also discuss the importance of fairness when players lack information about each others payoffs.

Keywords: TBD (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004-08-11

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ecm:nasm04:655

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings from Econometric Society
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Christopher F. Baum ().