 Foreign direct investment, investment incentives, and firing costs: A disadvantage for "inflexible Europe"?Holger Görg No 30, European Economy Group Working Papers from European Economy Group Abstract: Investment incentives targeted at attracting multinational firms have been extensively documented and researched, and empirical evidence has shown them to be influential. The same is not true of exit costs. Yet, as recent theory suggests, there may be a trade-off between entry incentives and costs of exit, for example, due to employment protection. This paper focuses on just that trade-off in the case of US multinationals in 33 host countries. Our results suggest that both entry incentives and firing costs are important and ignoring the latter neglects an important dimension in firms’ location decision. This has implications for Europe as a location for FDI, as European labor markets are generally considered relatively inflexible compared to, for example, the US. New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec and nep-ifn Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eeg:euroeg:30 Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Access Statistics for this paper More papers in European Economy Group Working Papers from European Economy Group |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
Örebro University School of Business.