Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography

Ron Boschma and Koen Frenken ()

No 501, Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography

Abstract: The paper explains the commonalities and differences between neoclassical, institutional and evolutionary approaches that have been influential in economic geography during the last couple of decades. For all three approaches, we argue that they are in agreement in some respects and in conflict in other respects. While explaining to what extent and in what ways the Evolutionary Economic Geography approach differs from the New Economic Geography and the Institutional Economic Geography, we can specify the value-added of economic geography as an evolutionary science.

Keywords: evolutionary economic geography; new economic geography; institutional economic geography (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A12 B20 B25 R0 R1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-geo, nep-hpe and nep-pke
Date: 2005-02, Revised 2005-02
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://econ.geo.uu.nl/peeg/peeg0501.pdf Version February 2005 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:egu:wpaper:0501

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) from Utrecht University, Section of Economic Geography
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Tom Broekel ().