An Essay on the Foundations of Comparative Historical Social Science
No 22, ARENA Working Papers from ARENA
The relationship between history and sociology has been the subject of heated controversies ever since sociology was established as a discipline. These debates continue, and over the last decades, historical sociology has been at the core of debates spanning the whole spectrum from specific questions regarding quantitative studies to complex discussions of highly philosophical matters. This essay gives a background to and tries to draw some conclusions with reference to these recent debates. It is argued here that comparative historical sociology is more than a narrow branch of sociology, rather it offers a comprehensive alternative for macro-sociology and can be linked to a specific synthesis in sociology, namely that of interactionism. Comparative historical sociology can aid the disciplines it involves in specific ways: It can save history from drowning in monographs, it can help sociology avoid suffocation in the thin air of grand “social theory”, and it can help social science reflect on its predicament of always having to interpret the present.
Keywords: sociology; history (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2002/papers/02_22.xml Full text (text/html)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:erp:arenax:p0085
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ARENA Working Papers from ARENA
Series data maintained by Sindre Eikrem Hervig ().