Commitment and Observability in an Economic Environment

V Bhaskar

No 596, Economics Discussion Papers from University of Essex, Department of Economics

Abstract: Bagwell (1995) argues that commitment in undermined by the slightest imperfectness in observation. Guth, Ritzberger & Kirchsteiger (1998) question this assertion: for any finite leader-follower game, with arbitrary many players in each role and generic payoffs, they show that there always exists a subgame perfect equilibrium outcome that is accessible, i.e. it can be approximated by the outcome of a mixed equilibrium of the game with imperfect observation. We show that accessibility fails in a class of games played in economic environments, where the payoffs to commitment actions depend upon prices set by other agents, prices being chosen from a continuum. Accessibility requires either that commitment is not required or that the price setting agents have no monopoly power. Our result follows from a generalized indifference principle which mixed strategies must satisfy in such economic environments.

Date: 2005-07-17
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.essex.ac.uk/economics/discussion-papers/papers-text/dp596.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Discussion Papers Administrator, Department of Economics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, U.K.
http://www.essex.ac. ... /papers-request.shtm

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from University of Essex, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by R. E. Bailey ().