Choosing To Compete: How Different Are Girls and Boys?

Alison Lee Booth () and Patrick Nolen ()

Economics Discussion Papers from University of Essex, Department of Economics

Abstract: Using a controlled experiment, we examine the role of nurture in explaining the stylized fact that women shy away from competition. Our subjects (students just under 15 years of age) attend publicly-funded single-sex and coeducational schools. We found robust differences between the competitive choices of girls from single-sex and coed schools. Moreover, girls from single-sex schools behave more like boys even when randomly assigned to mixed-sex experimental groups. Thus it is untrue that the average female avoids competitive behaviour more than the average male. This suggests that observed gender differences might reflect social learning rather than inherent gender traits.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-lab
Date: 2009-07-21
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.essex.ac.uk/economics/discussion-papers/papers-text/dp673.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: Choosing to Compete: How Different Are Girls and Boys? (2009)
Working Paper: Choosing to Compete: How Different are Girls and Boys? (2009)
Working Paper: Choosing to Compete: How different are girls and boys? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:esx:essedp:673

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Discussion Papers Administrator, Department of Economics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, U.K.
http://www.essex.ac. ... /papers-request.shtm

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Economics Discussion Papers from University of Essex, Department of Economics
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Essex Economics Web Manager ().