The Resource Curse Revisited and Revised: A Tale of Paradoxes and Red Herrings

Christa N. Brunnschweiler () and Erwin Bulte ()

No 06/61, CER-ETH Economics working paper series from CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich

Abstract: We critically evaluate the empirical basis for the so-called resource curse and find that, despite the topic’s popularity in economics and political science research, this apparent paradox is a red herring. The most commonly used measure of ‘resource abundance’ can be more usefully interpreted as a proxy for ‘resource dependence’—endogenous to underlying institutional factors. In multiple estimations that combine resource abundance and dependence, institutional and constitutional variables, we find that (i) resource abundance, constitutions and institutions determine resource dependence, (ii) resource dependence does not affect growth, and (iii) resource abundance positively affects growth and institutional quality.

Keywords: Natural resource curse; economic growth; growth regressions; political regimes; institutions; constitutions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O11 O13 Q0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
Date: 2006-12
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cer.ethz.ch/research/wp_06_61.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The resource curse revisited and revised: A tale of paradoxes and red herrings (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eth:wpswif:06-61

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CER-ETH Economics working paper series from CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().