Abstract:
Since the writing of David Hume, in the eighteenth century, there has been a general agreement amogst economists that an increase in the stock of money leads, initially, to an increase in economic activity. Most writer have attributed the real effects of money, in the short run, to mistaken expectations, non-market clearing or both. We argue instead, that neither of these channels is needed to explain the facts. We show that a competitive market-clearing model in which money enter the production function can reproduce the broad features of data.
More papers in Economics Working Papers from European University Institute Address: Badia Fiesolana, Via dei Roccettini, 9, 50016 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Marcia Gastaldo ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .