The present-value model of the current account has been rejected: Round up the usual suspects

James Nason () and John H. Rogers ()

No 2003-7, Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Abstract: Tests of the present-value model of the current account are frequently rejected by the data. Standard explanations rely on the "usual suspects" of nonseparable preferences, shocks to fiscal policy and the world real interest rate, and imperfect international capital mobility. The authors confirm these rejections on postwar Canadian data, then investigate their source by calibrating and simulating alternative versions of a small open economy, real business cycle model. Monte Carlo experiments reveal that, although each of the suspects matters in some way, a "canonical" RBC model moves closest to the data when it features exogenous world real interest rate shocks.

Keywords: Balance of payments; International finance; Econometric models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.frbatlanta.org/filelegacydocs/wp0307a.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The present-value model of the current account has been rejected: round up the usual suspects (2003)
Working Paper: The Present Value Model of the Current Account Has Been Rejected: Round Up the Usual Subjects (2001)
Journal Article: The present-value model of the current account has been rejected: Round up the usual suspects (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedawp:2003-7

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper from Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Diane Rosenberger ().