A decade lost and found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s

Raphael Bergoeing (), Patrick J. Kehoe (), Timothy J, Kehoe and Raimundo Soto ()
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Timothy J. Kehoe ()

No 292, Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: Chile and Mexico experienced severe economic crises in the early 1980s. This paper analyzes four possible explanations for why Chile recovered much faster than did Mexico. Comparing data from the two countries allows us to rule out a monetarist explanation, an explanation based on falls in real wages and real exchange rates, and a debt overhang explanation. Using growth accounting, a calibrated growth model, and economic theory, we conclude that the crucial difference between the two countries was the earlier policy reforms in Chile that generated faster productivity growth. The most crucial of these reforms were in banking and bankruptcy procedures.

Keywords: Depressions; Productivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge and nep-lam
Date: 2001
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://minneapolisfed.org/research/sr/sr292.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: A Decade Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s (2001)
Working Paper: A Decade Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s (2001)
Working Paper: A Decade Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s (2001)
Journal Article: A Decade Lost and Found: Mexico and Chile in the 1980s (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmsr:292

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Report from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Diane Rosenberger ().