Comparing alternative representations and alternative methodologies in business cycle accounting

V. V. Chari, Patrick J. Kehoe () and Ellen R. McGrattan

No 647, Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis

Abstract: We make two comparisons relevant for the business cycle accounting approach. We show that in theory representing the investment wedge as a tax on investment is equivalent to representing this wedge as a tax on capital income as long as the probability distributions over this wedge in the two representations are the same. In practice, convenience dictates differing probability distributions over this wedge in the two representations. Even so, the quantitative results under the two representations are essentially identical. We also compare our methodology, the CKM methodology, to an alternative one used in Christiano and Davis (2006) as well as by us in early incarnations of the business cycle accounting approach. We argue that the CKM methodology rests on more secure theoretical foundations.> > Replaced by Staff Report No. 384

Keywords: Business; cycles; -; Econometric; models (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc, nep-dge and nep-mac
Date: 2006
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/research/WP/WP647.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing alternative representations and alternative methodologies in business cycle accounting (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedmwp:647

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/pubs/

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Diane Rosenberger ().