In Defence of Usury Laws

David de Meza and Giuseppe Coco ()

FMG Discussion Papers from Financial Markets Group

Abstract: This paper shows that if moral hazard leads to credit rationing, an appropriate usury law must raise social welfare. Under market clearing, a usury law is always beneficial if funds are inelastically supplied. When entrepreneurial heterogeneity is introduced, an improvement arises even when the supply of funds is elastic. These results apply also in costly state-verification models and diversionary models of the credit market. Finally, a usury law proves useful in eliminating low-yielding projects when some entrepreneurs display excess optimism.

Date: 2001-01

Downloads: (external link)
http://fmg.lse.ac.uk/pdfs/dp369.pdf (application/pdf)
Financial Markets Group Working Papers are free to download for academics and students, and for our subscribers and sponsors. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, or if you do not fall into one of these categories but would like to pay for a copy, please contact us at fmg@lse.ac.uk

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fmg:fmgdps:dp369

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FMG Discussion Papers from Financial Markets Group
Series data maintained by The FMG Administration ().