(UBS Pensions series 12) Pension Fund Governance and the Choice Between Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans

Andrea Prat
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Timothy Besley ()

FMG Discussion Papers from Financial Markets Group

Abstract: Recent events in several countries have underscored the importance of good governance in private occupational pension plans. The present paper uses contract theory to analyze the interplay of residual claims and control rights in private pensions. The residual claimant is the plan sponsor in a defined benefit (DB) plan and the pool of beneficiaries in a defined contribution (DC) plan. The main control rights we examine relate to decisions on funding, asset allocation, and asset management. Under complete contracting, governance can be shown to be neutral: DC and DB plans di.er only on risk allocation. If instead contracts are incomplete, a DB (DC) plan should: (1) Assign more vigilance responsibility to the sponsor (beneficiaries); (2) Rely less (more) on trustees; (3) Tend to employ trustees that are professional experts (caring insiders); (4) Assign asset allocation rights tothe sponsor (beneficiaries); (5) have strict funding requirements.

Date: 2003-06

Downloads: (external link)
http://fmg.lse.ac.uk/pdfs/dp454.pdf (application/pdf)
Financial Markets Group Working Papers are free to download for academics and students, and for our subscribers and sponsors. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, or if you do not fall into one of these categories but would like to pay for a copy, please contact us at fmg@lse.ac.uk

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fmg:fmgdps:dp454

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FMG Discussion Papers from Financial Markets Group
Series data maintained by The FMG Administration ().