Abstract:
This paper analyses preference evolution in a bargaining situation. We show that preferences for reciprocity, that sustain a con ict-free outcome, are viable if players have enough information about opponents' preferences. However, de-pending on the initial starting point, preference evolution can in general both enhance or reduce subjective and material welfare, relative to the situation where all players have the usual materialistic preferences.
Keywords:ALTRUISM; EFFICIENCY; SOCIAL WELFARE (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:C7 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 2001
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
More papers in Working Papers from Aarhus School of Business - Department of Economics Address: Department of Economics, Faculty of Business Administration. The Aarhus School of Business. Fuglesangs Alle 4. DK- 8210 Aarhus V - Denmark Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .