Abstract:
Co-operation is the essence of an organization's existence and a key condition for its long term survival. Change efforts put co-operation to a dire test. The reason is not the change itself, but rather managers' tendency to stick to oversimplified ideas or tools, and to single-mindedly pursue their implementation. Any idea's or management tool's usefulness is time-bound, and in the course of a change, the need to maintain relevance and insure co-operation succumbs to the past usefulness of the tools at hand. Even more importantly, managers are rarely aware of the need to maintain co-operation and, lacking a stable beacon, are led adrift by the change momentum. In this paper, we use a 20 year long longitudinal study of Hydro-Quebec, one of the largest power utility in North America, to show how the process of change leads away from the need to maintain co-operation and thus emphasizes trivia. We argue that, in a major change effort, the need to maintain co-operation, rather than any other objective, should be the manager's walking stick.
More papers in Working Papers from Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales de Montreal- Address: Canada; ECOLE DES HAUTES ETUDES COMMERCIALES (H.E.C.), 5255 DECELLES MONTREAL H3T 1V6 QUEBEC Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .