Abstract:
We consider a firm that is subject to employment protection laws that limit the firm's ability to fire labor. In particular, we suppose that though a firm which shuts down can fire all its workers, it may fire no fewer. Compared to a firm that is subject to no employment protection, a firm constrained in firing will prefer a risk-free project over a risky one, but may prefer the riskier of two risky projects.
Keywords:LABOUR; PROTECTIONISM; RISK (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:M13J23 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 2000
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
More papers in University of Helsinki, Department of Economics from Department of Economics Address: University of Helsinki; Department of Economics, P.O.Box 54 (Unioninkatu 37) FIN-00014 Helsingin Yliopisto Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .