The Informational Role of Upstairs and Downstairs Trading

Sanford Jay Grossman

Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers from Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research

Abstract: Much of economic theory is concerned with understanding price determination in competitive markets. Such theories assume that all individuals continuously participate in one giant market where they can express their demands for all assets simultaneously as a function of a giant price vector. This assumption of simultaneous and continuous participation in all markets is inconsistent with two important facts: First, it is costly for an individual or an institution to continuously express demands in any single market, and second it is simply impossible to trade in all markets simultaneously. These two facts create a need for intermediaries. Much is known about the role of intermediaries as principals who add liquidity to markets by trading on their own account. However, far less is known about the informational role of intermediaries. In this paper, we will analyze the consequences of the fact that intermediaries play a fundamental role as repositories of information.

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: THE INFORMATION ROLE OF UPSTAIRS AND DOWNSTAIRS TRADING (1990)
Journal Article: The Informational Role of Upstairs and Downstairs Trading (1992)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:fth:pennfi:22-90

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research Working Papers from Wharton School Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Thomas Krichel ().