Decisions about Pap tests: What influences women and providers?

Denzil G. Fiebig, Marion Haas, Ishrat Hossain () and Rosalie Viney
Additional contact information
Ishrat Hossain: CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney

Working Papers from CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney

Abstract: Despite the success internationally of cervical screening programs debate continues about optimal program design. This includes increasing participation rates among under-screened women, reducing unnecessary early re-screening, improving accuracy of and confidence in screening tests, and determining the cost-effectiveness of program parameters, such as type of screening test, screening interval and target group. For all these issues, information about consumer and provider preferences and insight into the potential impact of any change to program design on consumer and provider behaviour are essential inputs into evidence-based health policy decision making. This paper reports the results of discrete choice experiments to investigate womenís choices and providersí recommendations in relation to cervical screening in Australia. Separate experiments were conducted with women and general practitioners, with attributes selected to allow for investigation of interaction between womenís and providersí preferences and to determine how women and general practitioners differ in their preferences for common attributes. The results provide insight into the agency relationship in this context. Our results indicate a considerable commonality in preferences but the alignment was not complete. Women put relatively more weight on cost, chance of a false positive and if the recommended screening interval were changed to one year.

Keywords: Cervical Screening; Discrete choice experiments; Agency relationships, Consumer preferences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-dcm and nep-hea
Date: 2007-10
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/wp2007_11.pdf First version, September 2006 Current version, October 2007 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:her:chewps:2007/11

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Liz Chinchen ().