Assessing the costs of organised health programs: The case of the National Cervical Screening Program

Marion Haas, Marian Shanahan and Rob Anderson
Additional contact information
Marian Shanahan: National Drug & Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW
Rob Anderson: Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG) & Institute for Health & Social Care

Working Papers from CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney

Abstract: Economic evaluations of health care programs are relatively common. However, the costs reported often use budgetary information alone, rather than undertake the potentially more complex task of using a variety of routinely collected data for which adjustments and assumptions will need to be made. Relative to the effort required for an individual-level costing exercise, investigating the costs of a health care program targeted at a population or group is likely to be a more complex and difficult undertaking. This paper describes the process of undertaking a program-level cost analysis, using principles developed to ensure the quality of such evaluations. Documenting the costs of the National Cervical Screening Program is used to illustrate the approach and the difficulties encountered, assumptions made and solutions employed are discussed. Despite the limitations to estimating the costs of health programs identified in this paper, evaluators can take full advantage of the data available by using a systematic description of the program as a basis for costing, testing the assumptions and adjustments needed using the expertise available within a specifically appointed advisory or working group and using sensitivity analysis to provide a greater level of confidence in the results.

Keywords: Cervical screening; economic evaluation; Australia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea and nep-ppm
Date: 2007-04
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chere.uts.edu.au/pdf/wp2007_2.pdf First version, April 2007 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:her:chewps:2007/2

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Liz Chinchen ().