Innovation and the exploitation of intellectual property law

No 2003-4, Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management

Abstract: This paper compares documented corporate patent practice with the way the patent institution has been modelled in economics and management writing. In particular, there is common confusion of the patent’s role as a temporary exclusive development right (correct) and the idea that the patent is a temporary economic monopoly (possible, but often not the case). This difference is important for the judgement of whether the strategy of innovation suppression can take place. A number of examples of patenting practice presented in the management literature (Dunford 1987) are shown to be examples of the development of a workable prospect rather than the abuse of the patent system to suppress innovation. The problem with the patent institution is then, not the abuse of patent-protected monopoly, but the potential for abuse of the legal machinery of the patent system. Examples of such abuse are given, including lobbying efforts to change the law to favour private control over the public interest function of intellectual property law.

Keywords: Patenting practice; Innovation; Intellectual property law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-tid
Date: Written 2003-11-01
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hba.dk/fsk/pdfs/0003116.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Management
Address: The Aarhus School of Business, Fuglesangs Allé 4, DK-8210 Aarhus V, Denmark
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Helle Vinbaek Stenholt ().