EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Adoption of Job Rotation: Testing the Theories

Tor Eriksson () and Jaime Ortega ()

No 04-3, Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to test three theories for why firms introduce job rotation schemes:

employee learning, employer learning, and employee motivation. The earlier literature has made

use of either information about establishment characteristics or data coming from personnel

records of a single firm. In order to improve upon this, we make use of a unique data set

constructed by merging information from a fairly detailed survey directed at Danish private

sector firms with a linked employer-employee panel data. This allows us to include firm and

workforce characteristics as well as firms HRM practices as explanatory variables, and hence to

carry out a more comprehensive analysis.

Keywords: Job rotation; employee learning; employer learning; employee motivation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M12 M54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eec and nep-lab
Date: 2004-05-26
Note: Submitted for publishing in: Industrial and Labor Relations Review
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.hha.dk/nat/wper/04-3_tor.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The adoption of job rotation: Testing the theories (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:aareco:2004_003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics
Address: The Aarhus School of Business, Prismet, Silkeborgvej 2, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Helle Vinbaek Stenholt ().

 
Page updated 2009-11-30
Handle: RePEc:hhs:aareco:2004_003