Is There Really an Inverted U-shaped Relation Between Competition and R&D?
Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall () and
Andreas Poldahl ()
Additional contact information Patrik Gustavsson Tingvall: European Institute of Japanese Studies, Postal: Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, S-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden, http://www.hhs.se/eijs Andreas Poldahl: Örebro Universitet, Postal: Örebro Universitet, Fakultetsgatan 1, 701 82 Örebro, http://www.oru.se
Abstract:
We test whether predictions of the Aghion and Howitt (2004) model are supported by firm level data. In particular, we analyze if there is an inverted U-shaped relation between competition and R&D. Results show that the inverted U-shaped relation is supported by the Herfindahl index but not by the price cost margin. Using the Herfindahl index results suggest that breaking up monopolies increases R&D while further increases in competition most likely leads to reduced R&D. Comparing different estimators, we find that time-series based estimators typically result in less clear-cut results, probably driven by a lack of time series variation in measures of competition.
More papers in EIJS Working Paper Series from The European Institute of Japanese Studies Address: The European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, 113 83 Stockholm, Sweden Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Nanhee Lee ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .