Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? Evidence from a natural field experiment
Francisco Alpizar (),
Fredrik Carlsson () and
Olof Johansson-Stenman ()
Additional contact information Francisco Alpizar: Environment for Development Center, Tropical Agricultural and Higher Education Center (CATIE), Postal: 7170 Turrialba, Costa Rica
Abstract:
We investigate the importance of the social context for people’s voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica, using a natural field experiment. Some subjects make actual contributions while others state their hypothetical contribution. Both the degree of anonymity and provided information about the contributions of others influence subject contributions in the hypothesized direction. We do find a substantial hypothetical bias with regard to the amount contributed. However, the influence of the social contexts is about the same when the subjects make actual monetary contributions as when they state theirhypothetical contributions. Our results have important implications for validity testing of stated preference methods: a comparison between hypothetical and actual behavior should be done for a given social context.
More papers in Working Papers in Economics from Göteborg University, Department of Economics Address: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University Box 640, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG, Sweden Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Jens Anmark ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .