Conspicuous Leisure: Optimal Income Taxation when both Relative Consumption and Relative Leisure Matter
Thomas Aronsson () and
Olof Johansson-Stenman ()
Additional contact information Thomas Aronsson: Department of Economics, Umeå University, Postal: 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Abstract:
Previous studies on public policy under relative consumption concerns have ignored the role of leisure comparisons. This paper considers a two-type optimal nonlinear income tax model where people care both about their relative consumption and their relative leisure. Increased consumption positionality typically implies higher marginal income tax rates for both the high-ability and the low-ability type, whereas leisure positionality has an offsetting role. However, this offsetting role is not symmetric; concern about relative leisure implies a progressive income tax component, i.e., a component that is larger for the high-ability than for the low-ability type. Moreover, leisure positionality does not modify the policy rule for public good provision when the income tax is optimally chosen.
More papers in Working Papers in Economics from Göteborg University, Department of Economics Address: Department of Economics, School of Business, Economics and Law, Göteborg University Box 640, SE 405 30 GÖTEBORG, Sweden Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Jens Anmark ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .