Why Are Capital Income Taxes So High?

Martin Floden ()

No 623, Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance from Stockholm School of Economics

Abstract: The Ramsey optimal taxation theory implies that the tax rate on capital income should be zero in the long run. This result holds even if the social planner only cares about workers that do not hold assets, or if the planner only cares about any other group in the economy. This paper demonstrates that although all households agree that capital income taxation should be eliminated in the long run, they do not agree on how to eliminate these taxes. Wealthy households would prefer a reform that is funded mostly by higher taxes on labor income while households with little wealth would prefer a reform that is funded mostly by high taxes on initial wealth. Pareto improving reforms typically exist, but the welfare gains of such reforms are modest.

Keywords: optimal taxation; inequality; redistribution (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E60 H21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dge, nep-mac, nep-pbe, nep-pol and nep-pub
Date: 2006-03-08

Downloads: (external link)
http://swopec.hhs.se/hastef/papers/hastef0623.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Why Are Capital Income Taxes So High? (2007)
Journal Article: WHY ARE CAPITAL INCOME TAXES SO HIGH? (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:hastef:0623

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance from Stockholm School of Economics
Address: The Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, 113 83 Stockholm, Sweden
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Helena Lundin ().