Fines, Leniency and Rewards in Antitrust: An Experiment
Maria Bigoni,
Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof (),
Chloé Le Coq () and
Giancarlo Spagnolo Additional contact information Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof: Research Institute of Industrial Economics (IFN), Postal: P.O. Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden, http://www.ifn.se/SOF Chloé Le Coq: Stockholm Institute of Transition Economies, Postal: Stockholm School of Economics
Abstract:
This paper reports results from an experiment studying how fines, leniency programs and reward schemes for whistleblowers affect cartel formation and prices. Antitrust without leniency reduces cartel formation, but increases cartel prices: subjects use costly fines as (altruistic) punishments. Leniency further increases deterrence, but stabilizes surviving cartels: subjects appear to anticipate harsher times after defections as leniency reduces recidivism and lowers post-conviction prices. With rewards, cartels are reported systematically and prices finally fall. If a ringleader is excluded from leniency, deterrence is unaffected but prices grow. Differences between treatments in Stockholm and Rome suggest culture may affect optimal law enforcement.
More papers in Working Paper Series from Research Institute of Industrial Economics Address: Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Elisabeth Gustafsson ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .