Abstract:
This paper compares the choice of focal points in a Nash Demand Game embedded in an abstract frame with the corresponding choices in a game with a real product frame where parties bargain for a well-known consumer product. We find that the frame has a substantial impact on the fraction of subjects choosing the equal split outcome casting doubt on the robustness of this solution in bargaining over real goods. The paper shows that there is notable heterogeneity among subjects with regard to their choices of focal points and reports individual characteristics predicting these choices.
More papers in Working Papers from Lund University, Department of Economics Address: Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Box 7082, S-220 07 Lund,Sweden Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by David Edgerton ().