EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Favourable cost-benefit in an early defibrillation program using dual dispatch of ambulance and fire services in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Björn Sund (), Leif Svensson, Mårten Rosenqvist and Jacob Hollenberg
Additional contact information
Björn Sund: Department of Business, Economics, Statistics and Informatics, Postal: Örebro University, Swedish Business School, SE - 701 82 ÖREBRO, Sweden
Leif Svensson: Department of Cardiology, Postal: Karolinska Institute, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Mårten Rosenqvist: Department of Cardiology, Postal: Karolinska Institute, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Jacob Hollenberg: Department of Cardiology, Postal: Karolinska Institute, South Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

No 2010:13, Working Papers from Örebro University, School of Business

Abstract:

Aims: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is fatal without treatment and time to defibrillation is an extremely important factor in relation to survival. We performed a cost-benefit analysis of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm, Sweden.

Methods and Results: A cost-benefit analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of dual dispatch defibrillation. The increased survival rates were estimated from a real world implemented intervention and the monetary value of a life (€ 2.2 million) was applied to this benefit by using results from a recent stated-preference study. The estimated costs include defibrillators (including expendables/maintenance), training, hospitalisation/health care, call-outs for the fire services, overhead resources and costs for the dispatch centre. The estimated number of additional saved lives was 16 per year, yielding a benefit-cost ratio of 36. The cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALY) was estimated to be € 13 000 and the cost per saved life was € 60 000.

Conclusions: The intervention of dual dispatch defibrillation by ambulance and fire services in the County of Stockholm had positive economic effects. For the cost-benefit analysis the return on investment was high and the cost-effectiveness showed levels below the threshold value for economic efficiency used in Sweden. The cost-utility analysis categorises the cost per QALY as medium.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; cost-utility analysis; cost-effectiveness analysis; cardiac arrest; defibrillation; ambulance; fire services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 H43 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
Date: 2010-10-19
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.oru.se/PageFiles/50107/WP%2013%202010.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2010_013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Örebro University, School of Business
Address: Örebro University School of Business, SE - 701 82 ÖREBRO, Sweden
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2014-10-18
Handle: RePEc:hhs:oruesi:2010_013