Environmental policy without costs? A review of the Porter hypothesis

Runar Brännlund () and Tommy Lundgren ()
Additional contact information
Runar Brännlund: Department of Economics, Umeå University, Postal: S 901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Tommy Lundgren: Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Postal: S 901 83 Umeå, Sweden

No 766, Umeå Economic Studies from Umeå University, Department of Economics

Abstract: This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical literature connected to the so called Porter Hypothesis. That is, to review the literature connected to the discussion about the relation between environmental policy and competitiveness. According to the conventional wisdom environmental policy, aiming for improving the environment through for example emission reductions, do imply costs since scarce resources must be diverted from somewhere else. However, this conventional wisdom has been challenged and questioned recently through what has been denoted the “Porter hypothesis”. Those in the forefront of the Porter hypothesis challenge the conventional wisdom basically on the ground that resources are used inefficiently in the absence of the right kind of environmental regulations, and that the conventional neo-classical view is too static to take inefficiencies into account. The conclusions that can be made from this review is (1) that the theoretical literature can identify the circumstances and mechanisms that must exist for a Porter effect to occur, (2) that these circumstances are rather non-general, hence rejecting the Porter hypothesis in general, (3) that the empirical literature give no general support for the Porter hypothesis. Furthermore, a closer look at the “Swedish case” reveals no support for the Porter hypothesis in spite of the fact that Swedish environmental policy the last 15-20 years seems to be in line the prerequisites stated by the Porter hypothesis concerning environmental policy.

Keywords: Environmental policy; the Porter hypothesis; productivity; profitability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D20 H23 Q52 Q55 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cse and nep-env
Date: 2009-03-26

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.umu.se/ues/ues766.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hhs:umnees:0766

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Umeå Economic Studies from Umeå University, Department of Economics
Address: Department of Economics, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Kjell-Göran Holmberg ().