Abstract:
It is a well-known property that standard GMM estimators for dynamic panel data might perform poorly in small samples. Several papers have noted this to be especially true for the estimated standard errors, which are normally biased downwards. The aim of the present paper is to compare how two recently suggested bootstrap procedures can assist inference in dynamic panel data models, when the mentioned small-sample bias is a potential problem. We do this by means of Monte Carlo experiments, forming tests using both standard errors estimated by asymptotic approximations, as well as by bootstrap procedures. The results give a fairly clear support for using bootstrap inference. Whereas the tests based on asymptotics have empirical levels that may deviate substantially from their nominal ones, the bootstrap procedures appear to perform quite well in the context of dynamic panel data estimation.
Keywords:Dynamic panel data; bootstrapping (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:C15C23 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Date: 1998-08-24
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works: This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
More papers in Working Paper Series from Uppsala University, Department of Economics Address: Department of Economics, Uppsala University, P. O. Box 513, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Katarina Grönvall ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .