The Economics of Vocation or Why is a Badly Paid Nurse a Good Nurse?

Anthony Giles Heyes ()

No 03/4, Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics from Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London

Abstract: Given the longstanding shortage of nurses in many jurisdictions, why couldn’t nursing wages be raised to attract more people into the profession? We tell a story in which the status of nursing as a ‘vocation’ implies that increasing wages reduces the average quality of applicants attracted. The underlying mechanism accords with the notion that increasing wages might attract the ‘wrong sort’ of people into the profession and highlights an (in)e?ciency wage mechanism, particular to vocations, which makes wages sticky upwards. The analysis has implications for job design in vocation-based sectors such as nursing and teaching.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
Date: 2003-12, Revised 2003-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (8) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.rhul.ac.uk/economics/Research/WorkingPapers/pdf/dpe0304.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The economics of vocation or 'why is a badly paid nurse a good nurse'? (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hol:holodi:0304

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Royal Holloway, University of London: Discussion Papers in Economics from Department of Economics, Royal Holloway University of London
Address: Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, TW20 0EX, UK.
Series data maintained by Claire Blackman (). This e-mail address is bad, please contact .