IS AN INEQUALITY-NEUTRAL FLAT TAX REFORM REALLY NEUTRAL?
Juan Prieto Rodríguez,
Juan Gabriel Rodríguez and
Rafael Salas ()
Additional contact information
Juan Prieto Rodríguez: Universidad de Oviedo and Instituto de Estudios Fiscales
Juan Gabriel Rodríguez: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid and Instituto de Estudios Fiscales
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Juan Prieto-Rodriguez () and
Juan Gabriel Rodríguez ()
No 29-04 Classification-JEL : D39, D63, H30., Working Papers from Instituto de Estudios Fiscales
. Let us assume a revenue- and inequality-neutral flat tax reform shifting from a graduated-rate tax. Is this reform really neutral in terms of the income distribution? Traditionally, there has been a bias toward the inequality analysis, forgetting other relevant aspects of the income distribution. This kind of reforms implies a set of composite transfers, both progressive and regressive, even though inequality remains unchanged. This paper shows that polarization is a useful tool for characterizing this set of transfers caused by inequality-neutral tax reforms. A simulation exercise illustrates how polarization can be used to discriminate between two inequality-neutral tax alternatives.
Keywords: polarization; inequality; flat tax. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Is an inequality-neutral flat tax reform really neutral? (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hpe:wpaper:y:2004:i:29
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Instituto de Estudios Fiscales Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Ana Belén Miquel Burgos ().