Biases in Estimates of the Smoking Wage Penalty

Silke Anger () and Michael Kvasnicka

No SFB649DP2006-089, SFB 649 Discussion Papers from Humboldt University, Collaborative Research Center 649

Abstract: Empirical studies on the earnings effects of tobacco use have found significant wage penalties attached to smoking. We produce evidence that suggests that these estimates are significantly upward biased. The bias arises from a general failure in the literature to control for the past smoking behavior of individuals. 2SLS earnings estimates show that the smoking wage penalty is reduced by as much as a third, if past smoking of individuals is controlled for. Our results also point to significant wage gains for individuals that quit smoking, a finding that is of substantial interest, given the lack of evidence on the earnings effects of smoking cessation.

Keywords: Smoking; Wages; Earnings Regressions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J31 I19 C51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab
Date: 2006-12
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://sfb649.wiwi.hu-berlin.de/papers/pdf/SFB649DP2006-089.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Biases in Estimates of the Smoking Wage Penalty (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2006-089

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SFB 649 Discussion Papers from Humboldt University, Collaborative Research Center 649
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Janine Tellinger ().