Linking Revealed and Stated Preferences to Test External Validity
Catherine Kling () and
Christopher Azevedo ()
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications from Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University
A new approach is under way for the research agenda of environmental valuation. Rather than treating stated preference (SP) and revealed preference (RP) as competing valuation techniques, analysts have started to view them as complementary, where the strengths of each approach can be used to provide more precise and possibly more accurate benefit estimates. In this study, the authors reexamine the models and motives for combining SP and RP data. They also reconsider the interpretation of "consistent" or "inconsistent" findings of RP and SP data.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/DBS/PDFFiles/99wp222.pdf Full Text (application/pdf)
http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/synopsis.aspx?id=262 Online Synopsis (text/html)
Working Paper: LINKING REVEALED AND STATED PREFERENCES TO TEST EXTERNAL VALIDITY (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: /RePEc:ias:cpaper:99-wp222
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications from Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by ().