The Moral Trial: Economists and the Socratic Problem

Alessandro Lanteri ()

ICER Working Papers from ICER - International Centre for Economic Research

Abstract: Most people believe economists are more selfish than noneconomists. The reasons for such belief and for the related moral condemnation of economists remain confused. Both charges and evidence are insufficient to support substantial judgements. Further elaboration would be welcome before drawing implications from the current charge (i.e. economists are more selfish than noneconomists), further investigations into the causes of this phenomenon (self- selection or training) are required for blaming economists and suggesting corrections, and further evidence needs be gathered to sustain the charges. Alternative explanations (beyond selfselection and training) are also suggested, which might lead to different implications, charges, and corrections.

Keywords: Economics; Experiments; Moral Trial; Self-Interest; Socratic Problem (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A2 A11 A13 C91 C93 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007-03
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.icer.it/docs/wp2007/ICERwp44-07.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:icr:wpicer:44-2007

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ICER Working Papers from ICER - International Centre for Economic Research
Address: Viale Settimio Severo, 63 - 10133 Torino - Italy
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Alessandra Calosso ().