Economic Equality and Victory in War: An Empirical Investigation

James Galbraith (), Corwin Priest () and George Purcell
Additional contact information
James Galbraith: The University of Texas Inequality Project, The University of Texas at Austin
George Purcell: The University of Texas Inequality Project, The University of Texas at Austin

No 51, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality

Abstract: This paper tests a simple hypothesis: that given the occurrence of war between two countries, the country that is more egalitarian at the moment of military decision is likely to emerge the victor. First, we examine cases where comparative economic inequality can be measured directly, using the nearly comprehensive global data-sets of the University of Texas Inequality Project for the years 1963-1999. Second, we examine cases where reasonable inferences about comparative economic inequality may be drawn by analogy to UTIP measurements or from other political and economic evidence, including both bi-national wars and larger wars where there existed clear pair-wise fronts. Third, we discuss selected cases where inferences may be drawn from literary or historical sources. We find, all in all, that the evidence for an egalitarian victory proposition is remarkably strong.

New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pke
Date: 2006
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2006-51.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: ECONOMIC EQUALITY AND VICTORY IN WAR: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2006-51

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ().