Is Reserve Ratio Arithmetic More Pleasant?Joydeep Bhattacharya () and Joseph Haslag () Staff General Research Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics Abstract: Does it matter in a revenue-neutral setting if the government changes the inflation tax base or the inflation tax rate? We answer this question within the context of an overlapping generations model in which government bonds, capital, and cash reserves coexist. We consider experiments that parallel those studied in Sargent and Wallace's "unpleasant monetarist arithmetic;" the government uses seigniorage to service its debt, choosing between changing either the money growth rate (the inflation-tax rate) or the reserve requirement ratio (the inflation-tax base). In the former case, we obtain standard unpleasant arithmetic; in the long run, a permanent open market sale results in higher money growth, and higher long run inflation. Somewhat surprisingly, it turns out that for a given money growth rate, lower reserve requirements fund the government's interest expense. Associated with the lower reserve requirements is lower long-run inflation and higher welfare when compared to the money growth case. The broad message is that reserve-ratio arithmetic can be pleasant even when money growth arithmetic is not. JEL-codes: E4 (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Economica, 2003, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 471-491. There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:10248 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Staff General Research Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
Swedish Business School at Örebro University.