WHY DO RURAL FIRMS LIVE LONGER?

Li Yu, Peter Orazem () and Robert W. Jolly

Staff General Research Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics

Abstract: Rural firms have a higher survival rate than urban firms. Over the first 13 years after firm entry, the hazard rate for firm exits is persistently higher for urban firms. While differences in firm attributes explain some of the rural-urban gap in firm survival, rural firms retain a survival advantage 18.5% greater than observationally equivalent urban firms. We argue that in competitive markets, the remaining survival advantage for rural firms must be attributable to unobserved factors that must be known at the time of entry. A plausible candidate for such a factor is thinner markets for the capital of failed rural firms. The implied lower salvage value of rural firms suggests that firms sorting into rural markets must have a higher probability of success in order to leave their expected profits equal to what they could earn in an urban market.

Keywords: Rural; urban; entry; exit; survival; sorting; salvage value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr, nep-cse, nep-ent and nep-hea
Date: 2009-07-03
View list of references

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.econ.iastate.edu/research/webpapers/paper_13085_09013.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:isu:genres:13085

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff General Research Papers from Iowa State University, Department of Economics
Address: Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Stephanie Bridges ().