Does Happiness Adapt? A Longitudinal Study of Disability with Implications for Economists and Judges

Andrew J. Oswald and Nattavudh Powdthavee ()

No 2208, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

Abstract: Economics ignores the possibility of hedonic adaptation (the idea that people bounce back from utility shocks). This paper argues that economists are wrong to do so. It provides longitudinal evidence that individuals who become disabled go on to exhibit recovery in mental wellbeing. Adaptation to severe disability, however, is shown to be incomplete. The paper suggests ways to calculate the level of compensatory damages for the pain and suffering from disablement. Courts all over the world currently use ad hoc methods.

Keywords: disability; adaptation; happiness; legal compensation; wellbeing; GHQ scores (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D1 I3 I31 K0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-hea, nep-hpe, nep-law and nep-ltv
Date: 2006-07
View list of references View citations in EconPapers

Downloads: (external link)
ftp://repec.iza.org/RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp2208.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges (2008)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2208

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Address: IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany
Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Mark Fallak ().