Abstract:
This paper reports on available bibliometric evidence on the performance of UK research in economics. It examines some standard and non-standard sources of bibliometric evidence and in particular evidence from the ISI and EconLit databases and the Repository of Papers in Economics (RePEc). It also reports on research capacity of UK economics and some non-bibliometric sources of evidence.
Keywords:Research evaluation; bibliometrics. (search for similar items in EconPapers) JEL-codes:A10I23 (search for similar items in EconPapers) New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-edu, nep-eec, nep-eff, nep-his, nep-hpe and nep-sog Date: 2007-07 Note: Research for this project has been sponsored by the Royal Economic Society. The views expresed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Royal Economic Society. The authors wish to thank Alan Carruth and Denise Osborn for helpful comments and discussions on this report, and to Christian Zimmermann for valuable comments on an earlier draft. View citations in EconPapers
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from Centre for Economic Research, Research Institute for Public Policy and Management, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG - United Kingdom http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ec/cer/pubs_kerps.htm
More papers in Keele Economics Research Papers from Centre for Economic Research, Keele University Address: Department of Economics, University of Keele, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG - United Kingdom Contact information at EDIRC. Series data maintained by Martin E. Diedrich ().
This site is part of RePEc
and all the data displayed here is part of the RePEc data set.
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to
contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .